While diplomacy is a long-held skill from the realm of international relations and politics as a way to manage interactions and negotiations with tact, sensitivity, and strategic acumen, so is soft power, as a way to forge meaningful relationships through non-coercive means. Reading this annual assessment got me thinking about the presence and role of soft power and diplomacy in the business world. And as Prime Ministers or Presidents, must lead, engage, and influence their connected stakeholder systems through soft power and diplomacy, so must CEOs of all types.
Consider growth-stage CEOs who may have prevailing styles often rooted in single-minded focus, drive, and unwavering vision. The need for greater leadership dexterity to serve their own connected stakeholder network, using soft power and diplomacy as the means to achieve growth goals, is more important than ever.
Soft Power and Diplomacy Are Actually Hard Skills
The term “soft power” was coined by political scientist Joseph Nye, who referred to it as the ability to shape the preferences of others through appeal and attraction rather than coercion. In business, soft power can be cast as the ability for a leader to influence stakeholders — employees, customers, investors, partners, communities — through communication and relational dynamics. Unlike hard power rooted in authority and control, soft power relies on persuasion and the cultivation of goodwill.
I became acutely aware of, and learned the art of soft power and diplomacy when I joined Time Inc. back in 1997. After ten years in the process-heavy culture of global banking, tech, and operations, where getting things done came before or usurped getting to know your colleagues, media and publishing leaders were masters of using soft power and diplomacy to drive business results in a culture where relationship building, and communications skills were everything.
How Can Growth-Stage CEOs Apply Soft Power and Diplomacy to their Stakeholder Systems?
While mastering the nuances of soft power and diplomacy across a complex web of stakeholder relationships (from board dynamics or the next round of fundraising), is essential, my personal experiences include some CEOs who were driven by hubris or enlisted a “performative” soft power approach, that achieved the opposite of their intended purpose.
Below are a few ways growth-stage CEOs can leverage authentic soft power and diplomacy.
The Downsides of Soft Power and Diplomacy
Like most leadership skills or traits, over-reliance or misapplication can derail best intentions. For example, soft power can be seen as a weakness, or looked on as being indecisive, especially in high-stakes or competitive environments where more assertive actions are expected. This perception can undermine a leader’s authority and influence, leading to challenges in enforcing decisions and maintaining discipline.
Soft power may also involve excessive emphasis on empathy and relationship-building making it difficult to make objective decisions. This can result in favoritism or the inability to address poor performance effectively. And in crisis, soft power may be less effective when speed and decisive action is required.
Diplomacy can often create ambiguity or mixed signals given this is nuanced communication. Stakeholders might misinterpret a leader’s intentions, leading to misaligned expectations and potential conflicts. Finally, inauthentic diplomacy can be seen as manipulative, particularly if stakeholders feel they are being handled or managed.
Calibrating One’s Personal Soft Power and Diplomacy
Not all growth-stage CEOs have the patience, natural capability, or interest to apply soft power and diplomatic skills. But it is crucial to learn and understand their use, and the needed calibration and balance. Here are a few ways to help get there:
Recently, two growth-stage clients, a Founder/CEO and a C-level operating executive had specific opportunities put before them to develop their soft power and diplomatic skills. Each faces unique challenges around fund raising and a potential sale. Both are self-aware, but equally unaware that they can deliver greater impact by adapting some soft power and diplomacy capability to apply in these key situations. For both, driving toward mastery will require a certain degree of situational self-control and confidence-building. Learning to evolve and adapt under these high-pressure circumstances will require a uniquely deft touch that purposeful soft power and diplomacy can surely provide.